Gorilla jobs blog about australia's top rated legal tech platform with a lawyer typing on their laptop zoomed in on their hand

Australia’s Top Rated Legal Tech Platforms for 2025 Ranked

October 29, 2025 0 Comments
Australia’s Top-Rated Legal Tech Platforms for 2025 Ranked

New Australian research has asked lawyers which platforms they actually recommend. Below, we’ve grouped all 18 solutions from the study into two sections by Net Promoter Score (NPS): the Leaders and the Strong Performers. We also wanted to highlight a a quick guide to building a shortlist using the NPS, peer input and simple checks to help you navigate these platforms.

Key Summary

  • The highest-rated platforms are highlighted first.
  • The next tier of strong performers used across Australian practices and in-house teams.
  • Shortlist tools using NPS, peer recommendations and trials.

Source of rankings: the 2025 platform report by Agile Market Intelligence (linked in Information Sources below).


Leaders (NPS ≥ +15)

These platforms top the lawyer-rated list by NPS in the latest research.

  1. Dye & Durham — workflow, settlements and practice enablement tools widely used across Australia.
  2. Harvey — AI assistant for research and drafting within legal workflows.
  3. PEXA — electronic conveyancing and property settlement network.
  4. Smokeball — practice management with matter workflows and automation.
  5. InfoTrack — searches, eSigning, and matter-centric productivity tools.
  6. Law In Order — eDiscovery, managed document review and legal tech services.
  7. Smarter Drafter — document automation and precedents.
  8. triSearch — searches, eConveyancing and practice add-ons.
  9. iManage — document and knowledge management for firms and in-house teams.

Gorilla jobs blog about Australia's Top Rated Legal
Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash

Strong Performers (0 < NPS < +15)

Solid, widely used platforms that many teams rely on day-to-day.

  1. LawVu — matter and contract management for in-house legal teams.
  2. Lexis Advance — legal research platform.
  3. Securexchange — secure document and data exchange (conveyancing and property).
  4. SettleIT — property settlement support.
  5. Practical Law — know-how, practice notes and precedents.
  6. Intapp — intake, conflicts, risk and firm operations tooling.
  7. Lexis+ AI — AI-assisted research and drafting features.
  8. LEAP — practice management and matter workflows.
  9. Actionstep — cloud practice management for SMEs and mid-market firms.

Build a Shortlist with NPS (and What Really Drives Adoption)

The latest research indicates many firms first hear about platforms through peer recommendations, and that user experience is a key driver of loyalty. Rather than starting with long feature grids, use these quick steps to explore options that your peers rate highly and that feel good to use.

Step 1: Define the one problem you want to improve

Write one line: “We want to reduce X (e.g., conveyancing admin time, document retrieval, first-draft rework) by Y% this quarter.” Match it to a use-case cluster (matter management, research/drafting, eDiscovery, settlements/conveyancing, document automation).

Step 2: Form an NPS-first shortlist

From the ranked lists above, choose three platforms near the top for your use case. Sense-check with two peer recommendations (internal champions or trusted colleagues). This mirrors how many firms actually discover tools and helps avoid “demo bias”.

Step 3: Run a quick trial before any procurement steps

Give each candidate one real matter and two testers (a power user and a sceptic). Ask both to note quick impressions on three questions:

  • Can I complete the task in fewer clicks?
  • Is the interface clear under time pressure?
  • Did I reach a court- or client-ready output faster?

Keep a one-page pilot note (what was tested, time saved, any red flags). High NPS plus positive impressions is a simple signal to continue exploring.

Two sensible guardrails while you trial

  • Policy & risk: If AI features are involved, apply your existing guardrails (no confidential inputs to public models; human review before filing).
  • Change management-lite: Nominate a practice champion, schedule a training, and share “how we use it here” information to support adoption.

Conclusion

With a clear, lawyer-rated ranking and a simple way to trial tools, evaluating legal tech doesn’t need to be complex. Start from platforms your peers already recommend, run a quick trial on real work, and keep notes on what helps your team move faster with confidence.

Disclaimer: This blog is a general overview and should not be construed as professional legal, financial or medical advice.


FAQs

  • What is an NPS ranking and why use it here?

    Net Promoter Score indicates how likely current users are to recommend a platform. It’s a quick way to see peer advocacy before deeper evaluation.


  • Should we choose only from the Leaders list?

    Not necessarily. Strong Performers may fit your exact use case or budget better.


  • How do we keep trials low-risk?

    Use non-confidential matters where possible, apply your usual privacy and verification steps.


  • Does this article endorse specific products?

    No. The lists reflect lawyer-reported rankings in external research. Every firm should run its own evaluation.

Information Sources